Column: Time to Abolish LAHSA Is Now!

Undercounts by this bloated bureaucracy confirms an inability to solve the crisis of homelessness and encampments here in Venice and LA!

By Nick Antonicello

How does a government agency rely on securing an accurate count of the Los Angeles homeless population with volunteers on a single evening?

Having participated in four previous counts, why would an agency dedicated to solving this crisis not approach a homeless population survey much like how the federal government conducts census counts that have a far greater degree of reliability and accuracy?

For how hard is it to conduct a reliable and accurate count and why must these observations be made in the evening and not during the day?

It is a fundamental question that needs to be answered as Los Angeles considers new leadership in City Hall with a new Mayor as well as new members on the fifteen-member LA City Council.

While new leadership that has just arrived at the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), the larger question is this agency designed to maintain the status quo of this huge encampment population, or was it created to solve a problem that is now completely out of control?

For the whole delivery system of services with LAHSA in charge and the numerous service providers that are equally unaccountable and under the radar, is our city leadership willing to abolish a floundering agency and it’s collection of not-for-profits that don’t seem much interested in actual results?

For LAHSA, a super governmental agency of sorts created in 1993 with over 300 employees, 830 individuals, and 240 teams has been designated for nearly 30 years to provide sensible outreach or at least manage this out-of-control housing crisis that is not working!

The former executive director was paid handsomely, over $260,000 annually and reported to a 10-member commission of county and city officials whose mission it is to provide oversight as well as implement policies that would change the direction of homelessness, but as the dollar investment in this cottage industry of homelessness swells, where is a modicum of results?

For beyond the obvious ability to accurately count this street population, what are the standards, goals or objectives driven by real data that is reliable to adapt policies that actually assist and help the most vulnerable?

For agencies like LAHSA seem to suggest more money is at the core of their inability to make a serious dent in the encampment population, no matter what the circumstances. It is a frustrating process in which the public at-large has waited some thirty years for this bureaucracy to offer any sense of tangible progress.

With most policymakers and elected officials acknowledging that the construction of permanent housing is slow if not off line, where is the plan to move this population inside and grab hold of a process that does not tolerate the scourge of living on sidewalks?

Currently, the federal government spends some $9 billion dollars on homeless services and the state of California $7.2 billion. LAHSA is currently managing $800 million with $366 from LA County and $303 million from LA City. The federal government in addition kicks in $37 million to LAHSA and another $95.3 million from Sacramento.

For where is all this money going?

Employees and salaries?  

California has roughly 161,000 homeless individuals and that represents 27% of the entire homeless population of the United States.

In 2020 41,290 homeless individuals lived in LA with roughly 2,000 here in Venice. The irony of the homeless equation is that the entire amount of those on the street represents just 0.4% of the state population.  

For the true problem is one of managed and intentional containment.

Places like Los Angeles and in particular Venice are assuming the responsibility of this crisis and LAHSA seems to lack any plan of attack to address where homelessness is at epidemic levels as we come out of the pandemic.

And why is permanent housing not happening?

The answer is obvious, an expenditure so toxic due to selecting the most expensive of locales has permanent housing costs at roughly $837,000 per unit for single dwellers with that number increasing each and every day!

For the time for full disclosure and transparency regarding the whole process of managing the homeless dilemma is obvious and apparent.

LAHSA is a failed proposition and our elected officials must stop enabling a process that is dysfunctional and broken.

A data-driven approach must be considered and implemented no matter who is elected this November if we are to have a serious and reliable plan of action that decreases and eventually eliminates the street population that can no longer be tolerated and accepted as a part of a problem that has exhausted neighborhoods like Venice and beyond.

The time to dismantle LAHSA with a data-driven process that addresses mental illness, drug and alcohol recovery, and the influence of gang violence in these encampments needs to happen now.

The politics of homelessness must take a back seat and serious policy makers who are willing to take on the cottage industry of the unhoused should take a wrecking ball to this agency that has failed for three decades along with the service providers who are equally unaccountable, ineffective and picking the pockets of taxpayers must cease and desist.

Nick Antonicello is a longtime Venetian who serves on the Outreach and Oceanfront Walk Committees of the Venice Neighborhood Council (www.venicenc.org) and covers issues like homelessness and how it effects Venice. Have a take or a tip? You can e-mail Antonicello at nantoni@mindspring.com

in Opinion
Related Posts

New Program Can Help Protect Southern California Homes in the Event of an Earthquake

May 13, 2023

May 13, 2023

Residents Have Until May 31 To Apply For Seismic Retrofit Grants By Janiele Maffei, Chief Mitigation Officer for the California...

Column: Tired OF Declinists? Some Enduring New California Positives

April 18, 2023

April 18, 2023

By Thomas D. Elias California has taken a beating lately, with (mostly Republican) governors of other states blasting many aspects...

Column: SB 9 Ended R-1 Zoning, but It’s Not Meeting Goals

March 11, 2023

March 11, 2023

By Tom Elias More than a year after it took effect, the landmark housing density law known as SB 9...

Column: The Inevitable Conversions Begin Multiplying

February 25, 2023

February 25, 2023

By Tom Elias It’s a phenomenon from New York to Dallas to Fresno and Los Angeles, one that seemed inevitable...

Column: The Fantasy World of California Housing Policy

February 20, 2023

February 20, 2023

By Tom Elias If you’re looking for sure things among bills under consideration in the state Legislature, think of one...

Column: State Usurping Key Powers From Cities

January 28, 2023

January 28, 2023

By Tom Elias All over California last fall, hundreds of the civic minded spent thousands of hours and millions of...

Column – A California Positive: Kids Swarm Extra Classes

January 24, 2023

January 24, 2023

By Tom Elias It’s become a cliché, the shibboleth that California has lousy public schools and most of the kids...

​​Column: No One Very Pleased as New Rooftop Solar Rules Improve

December 9, 2022

December 9, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Only rarely does the California Public Utilities Commission, long known as the least responsive agency in...

Column: Will New Political Players Offer More Effective Local Government for Los Angeles & Venice?

December 5, 2022

December 5, 2022

Bass, Park could become unlikely allies in fighting homelessness, rising crime and the quality-of-life issues that plague both Angelenos and...

Column – Gas Gougers Beware: California Is Onto You at Last

November 11, 2022

November 11, 2022

By Tom Elias It has taken more than 50 years of on-and-off gasoline price gouging, but at long last California...

$87,581,047.01: Candidate Rick Caruso on Pace to Smash All Spending Records in His Bid to Become Mayor of Los Angeles

November 4, 2022

November 4, 2022

Caruso overwhelming Bass nearly 10-1! By Nick Antonicello According to the LA Ethics Commission as of October 31st, billionaire developer...

“Ten Takes” to Watch as CD-11 Hopefuls Park & Darling Close out the Campaign in a Mad Dash to the Finish Line!

November 4, 2022

November 4, 2022

By Nick Antonicello And after some sixteen months of posturing, positioning and intensive campaigning be it door to door, shaking...

Column: Who’s the ‘True’ Democrat in CD-11?

October 30, 2022

October 30, 2022

So who is the true Democrat in this race to succeed Mike Bonin in CD-11? While the campaign for city...

Column: Tenant Support Could Tip the Political Scales in CD-11 Council Race

October 29, 2022

October 29, 2022

Darling pushes advocacy of renter’s rights over Park in tightly contested battle to succeed Mike Bonin! By Nick Antonicello In...

Column: Money & Messaging That Is Persuasive and Memorable May Just Make Rick Caruso Our Next Mayor!

October 25, 2022

October 25, 2022

Moving away from direct mail, Caruso saturates broadcast television with a more disciplined message that is resonating with an angry...