Column: State Usurping Key Powers From Cities

By Tom Elias

All over California last fall, hundreds of the civic minded spent thousands of hours and millions of dollars running for posts on city councils and county boards.

Some of them may now be wondering why they bothered. For over the last three years, state government has gradually usurped almost full jurisdiction over one of the key powers always previously held by locally elected officials: The ability to decide what their city or county will look like and feel like over the next few decades.

That’s done via land use decisions which control how many housing units and commercial sites can be built up in a given time.

Via a series of laws mandating new levels of density everywhere in the state, whether or not they are needed and justified, this key local power now belongs to largely anonymous state officials who know little or nothing about most places whose future they are deciding.

It’s being done through the elimination of single-family, or R-1, zoning. It’s being done via the new requirement that the state Department of Housing and Community Development approve housing elements for every locality. If HCD does not approve such a plan for a city, developers can target it with virtually no limits, if they choose.

It’s all based on a supposed need for at least 1.8 million new housing units touted by HCD. This, despite the fact that the state auditor last spring found that HCD did not properly vet the documents and other instruments on which that estimate was based.

What’s more, only three years earlier, HCD was claiming more than 3.5 million new units were needed. Less than one-eighth that many have risen, yet HCD has cut its need estimate considerably.

And yet… cities and counties must do what they’re told by this demonstrably incompetent agency, or risk lawsuits and big losses in state grants for everything from sewers and road maintenance to police and fire departments. State Attorney General Rob Bonta even set up a new unit in his Justice Department to threaten and pursue noncompliant cities.

This leads localities to approve developments in ways they never did before, including some administrative approvals without so much as the possibility of a public hearing.

It leads to the absurd, as with Atherton trying to get state approval of a plan forcing almost all local homeowners to create “additional dwelling units” on the one-acre lots long required in the city. That’s instead of building almost 400 townhouses or apartments in a town of barely 7,000 persons.

And in Santa Monica, because the city council did not get its housing element approved, developers can probably not be stopped as they make plans for at least 12 large new buildings. So much for bucolic seaside living.

Santa Monica is also an example of a city buckling to state pressure to allow huge projects opposed by most of its citizens, a majority of whom are renters. That city has done nothing to stop or alter the largest development in its history, to be built on a property at a major intersection now occupied by a grocery and several other stores.

Despite heavy community interest, evidenced by the more than 2,000 persons on a Zoom call about the project last winter, the city will hold no public hearings and does not respond to most written communications from its citizens about the development. All because it fears the state will sue if it objects.

Several cities have begun to fight parts of today’s state domination of land use. Four Los Angeles County cities – Redondo Beach, Torrance, Carson and Whittier – are seeking a court order negating the 2021 Senate Bill 9, which allows single family homes to be replaced by as many as six units, with cities unable to nix any such project.

As city councils and county boards see their constituents objecting loudly to much of this scene, it’s inevitable that other lawsuits will follow. No one can predict whether or not courts will find the state Legislature and Gov. Gavin Newsom have vastly overreached in their power grab, which is all for the sake of increased density and based on unfounded predictions by bureaucrats who answer to no one.

Related Posts

Burned Retail Strip Sells in Palisades, Marking First Post-Wildfire Commercial Sale

April 16, 2025

April 16, 2025

The property remains uncleared and will require a lengthy permitting and review process before any redevelopment A fire-ravaged retail lot...

Palisades Council Opposes State Housing Density, Backs Wildfire Mortgage Relief

April 14, 2025

April 14, 2025

Two key pieces of legislation currently under consideration in Sacramento were addressed by the council The Pacific Palisades Community Council...

Burned Lot Listings Surge in Palisades as Post-Wildfire Market Softens

April 13, 2025

April 13, 2025

Although buyers remain hesitant, well-priced lots in desirable locations continue to move The real estate market in Pacific Palisades is...

New Santa Monica Place Management Aims to Restore Mall as “Heart and Soul” of Community

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

The firm plans to attract new retailers and restaurants in anticipation of the 2028 Olympics Commercial real estate firm Prism...

Marina del Rey Beachfront Building Blends Residential, Commercial Space for $12M

April 7, 2025

April 7, 2025

The listing highlights a 270-degree view spanning the Pacific Ocean, Venice Pier, and the Los Angeles skyline A four-story mixed-use...

Former MTV Star Says Parents Forced to Sell Palisades Home Due to High Reconstruction Cost

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

The home had been a “cherished” family residence for 37 years  Former reality TV personality Spencer Pratt said his parents...

Seven-Bedroom Venice Pad on Shell Ave. Hits Market at Under $7M

March 31, 2025

March 31, 2025

The home sits on a 5,740-square-foot lot and includes a two-car garage A newly listed property in Venice, featuring modern...

Google’s Iconic Binoculars Building in Venice is Up For Sale: REPORT

March 24, 2025

March 24, 2025

Google, which has occupied the property since 2011, remains under a triple-net lease that runs through October 2030 The Binoculars...

Five-Bedroom Silver Strand Home Overlooking the Canal Lists for $7M

March 24, 2025

March 24, 2025

Amenities include a sauna, temperature-controlled wine cellar, home theater, and an outdoor area  A five-bedroom, seven-bathroom home in Marina del...

Three Palisades Homes Get the Green Light to Rebuild: REPORT

March 23, 2025

March 23, 2025

As of last week, 72 homeowners had applied to rebuild in the city, while 135 submitted plans Three Pacific Palisades...

Palisades Land Market Lags Behind Altadena in Sales

March 16, 2025

March 16, 2025

The market trends indicate that demand for land in the Palisades remains cautious, with buyers weighing rebuilding costs and the...

1920s-Era Venice Apartment Building Goes on Market for $5.6M

March 10, 2025

March 10, 2025

Built in 1925, the two-story structure sits on a 7,684-square-foot corner lot A 1920s-era apartment building located at 923-933 N...

Palisades’ Real Estate Values Show Resiliency Following Wildfires

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

Home Prices Hold Steady as Burned Lots Flood the Market, Demand Remains Strong Eight weeks after the devastating Palisades Fire,...

Palisades Residents Divided Over Affordable Housing Project: REPORT

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

A contention point is a developer’s plan to turn his destroyed gas station into an eight-story apartment building As Pacific...

Six-Unit Multi-Family Marina del Rey Property Hits Market for $3.3M

March 2, 2025

March 2, 2025

Two top-floor vacant units are adjacent, allowing the possibility of combining them into a larger living space A six-unit multi-family...