​​Column: No One Very Pleased as New Rooftop Solar Rules Improve

By Tom Elias, Columnist

Only rarely does the California Public Utilities Commission, long known as the least responsive agency in state government to consumer concerns, return to the drawing board once it proposes a problem “solution.”

That’s partly because when the utilities commission (the PUC) floats ideas, it is essentially proposing them to itself; the five commissioners charged with coming up with ideas are also the ones with the votes to impose them on every affected Californian.

So the new rooftop solar rules the commission proposed in November are very unusual: An almost completely reworked proposal that hopes to keep rooftop energy expanding, but also to bring more equity for electricity consumers unable to pay for rooftop solar or living in apartments, condominiums and other places not suited for it.

The originally proposed new rules, offered in late 2021, sought to cut payments by 80 percent to solar rooftop owners for excess power their panels generate which is sent to the overall state power grid, and thus increases renewable energy supplies for everyone.  They also aimed to charge rooftop solar owners a fee of about $60 per month for linking to the grid, which lets them draw power when solar linked storage batteries run dry.

Since most solar rooftop owners pay upwards of $20,000 for panels and installation in order to avoid monthly electric bills, this plan promised to cut installations vastly. That would put about 67,000 installer and manufacturing jobs at risk, while slowing California’s march toward 100 percent renewable electricity.

Consumer groups and solar rooftop owners howled. Soon, Gov. Gavin Newsom, who appoints PUC members to staggered six-year terms but cannot fire them once they’re confirmed by the state Senate, joined the chorus.

So, in a virtually unprecedented move, the commissioners pulled back their plan from the brink of adoption, promising to create a revised proposal.

The new plan would still cut what solar owners are paid for excess energy, but not as much. This is their sop to advocate for utility customers unable to afford or install rooftop solar. The new rules would apply mostly to new rooftop solar owners.

Some advocates for non-rooftop electric customers have complained they pay monthly to maintain the state’s grid, while solar owners who link to that grid for emergency use don’t help with that cost.

At the same time, the new plan eliminates the proposed $60 monthly fee.

So this is a compromise. It does not make anyone very happy, but was fair enough to avoid the kind of withering criticism that drew Newsom to oppose the previous proposal.

The new plan’s exact reduction in what each solar owner can get for excess power will be based on the state’s “avoided cost” calculator, which figures how much solar owners save on electric bills each month.

Rooftop solar advocates like the Oakland-based Center for Biological Diversity, concede the new plan is an improvement, but oppose the reductions in electricity prices paid to owners.

The avoided cost calculator, it says, “ignores many benefits of (solar returned to the grid)…such as (improved) grid reliability, reduction in greenhouse gas and air pollution and local economic benefits including job creation.”

That likely will not convince the commissioners, who appear bent on imposing their new plan in a scheduled Dec. 16 meeting.

And yet, the new plan is the first sign in many years that the PUC may occasionally listen to consumers, rather than only utility companies. The commission has been widely criticized for more than 50 years for favoring companies like Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric over their customers.

This time, with all three of those companies firmly behind the original version of the new rooftop solar rules because it would have eliminated their payments to small solar owners, the PUC has bent a bit to a specific group of consumers, the residential solar owners.

That still leaves the PUC far short of looking after the interests of most utility customers, as the new responsiveness mainly benefits a group with above-average wealth.

Which makes the new solar metering plan an improvement, but does not lessen big doubts about the commission’s responsiveness.    

Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, “The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It,” is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net

Related Posts

Burned Retail Strip Sells in Palisades, Marking First Post-Wildfire Commercial Sale

April 16, 2025

April 16, 2025

The property remains uncleared and will require a lengthy permitting and review process before any redevelopment A fire-ravaged retail lot...

Palisades Council Opposes State Housing Density, Backs Wildfire Mortgage Relief

April 14, 2025

April 14, 2025

Two key pieces of legislation currently under consideration in Sacramento were addressed by the council The Pacific Palisades Community Council...

Burned Lot Listings Surge in Palisades as Post-Wildfire Market Softens

April 13, 2025

April 13, 2025

Although buyers remain hesitant, well-priced lots in desirable locations continue to move The real estate market in Pacific Palisades is...

New Santa Monica Place Management Aims to Restore Mall as “Heart and Soul” of Community

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

The firm plans to attract new retailers and restaurants in anticipation of the 2028 Olympics Commercial real estate firm Prism...

Marina del Rey Beachfront Building Blends Residential, Commercial Space for $12M

April 7, 2025

April 7, 2025

The listing highlights a 270-degree view spanning the Pacific Ocean, Venice Pier, and the Los Angeles skyline A four-story mixed-use...

Former MTV Star Says Parents Forced to Sell Palisades Home Due to High Reconstruction Cost

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

The home had been a “cherished” family residence for 37 years  Former reality TV personality Spencer Pratt said his parents...

Seven-Bedroom Venice Pad on Shell Ave. Hits Market at Under $7M

March 31, 2025

March 31, 2025

The home sits on a 5,740-square-foot lot and includes a two-car garage A newly listed property in Venice, featuring modern...

Google’s Iconic Binoculars Building in Venice is Up For Sale: REPORT

March 24, 2025

March 24, 2025

Google, which has occupied the property since 2011, remains under a triple-net lease that runs through October 2030 The Binoculars...

Five-Bedroom Silver Strand Home Overlooking the Canal Lists for $7M

March 24, 2025

March 24, 2025

Amenities include a sauna, temperature-controlled wine cellar, home theater, and an outdoor area  A five-bedroom, seven-bathroom home in Marina del...

Three Palisades Homes Get the Green Light to Rebuild: REPORT

March 23, 2025

March 23, 2025

As of last week, 72 homeowners had applied to rebuild in the city, while 135 submitted plans Three Pacific Palisades...

Palisades Land Market Lags Behind Altadena in Sales

March 16, 2025

March 16, 2025

The market trends indicate that demand for land in the Palisades remains cautious, with buyers weighing rebuilding costs and the...

1920s-Era Venice Apartment Building Goes on Market for $5.6M

March 10, 2025

March 10, 2025

Built in 1925, the two-story structure sits on a 7,684-square-foot corner lot A 1920s-era apartment building located at 923-933 N...

Palisades’ Real Estate Values Show Resiliency Following Wildfires

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

Home Prices Hold Steady as Burned Lots Flood the Market, Demand Remains Strong Eight weeks after the devastating Palisades Fire,...

Palisades Residents Divided Over Affordable Housing Project: REPORT

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

A contention point is a developer’s plan to turn his destroyed gas station into an eight-story apartment building As Pacific...

Six-Unit Multi-Family Marina del Rey Property Hits Market for $3.3M

March 2, 2025

March 2, 2025

Two top-floor vacant units are adjacent, allowing the possibility of combining them into a larger living space A six-unit multi-family...