This Bill Could Kill Rooftop Solar

By Tom Elias, Columnist

If politicians wanted to kill rooftop solar energy production in California, they could not find a better vehicle than a proposed new law known as Assembly Bill 1139.

This is a brainchild of Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez of San Diego, previously best known for authoring AB 5, another destructive bill she pushed into law in 2019 only to see her legislative colleagues a year later rescind many of its onerous provisions. AB 5 was despised especially by folks it was supposed to help.

The newest Gonzalez project is – like AB 5 – a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Where AB 5 originally required companies using contract workers to convert them to regular employees who could then be unionized, AB 1139 purports to stabilize conditions for California residents installing solar panels atop their homes.

AB 5 caused or threatened to cause an end to the jobs of thousands of Californians, from freelance writers to court reporters to musicians. Similarly, AB 1139 would likely stifle rooftop solar installations around the state, home to about half of all such projects nationally.

Here are four things AB 1139 would do in the name of bettering home-based solar power:

  • It would end the state’s current policy of requiring electric utilities to ensure that “customer-sited generation continues to grow sustainably.” That’s a massive change in state policy. It would concentrate all renewable energy efforts in the hands of big utilities including California’s largest utility, which has been convicted of corporate crimes as serious as manslaughter.
  • It would end the current guarantee to homeowners who install solar that net metering will remain stable for 20 years after systems go in. This means the price homeowners get for excess energy they contribute to the general electric grid will drop.
  • And it calls on the scandal-ridden state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to create new net metering rules within two years to set payments to solar owners for excess power at the level currently paid for wholesale power. That, say solar advocates, would cut payments to homeowners who install solar by about 80 percent.

This is a utility company pipe dream come to life, something for which the electric providers have spent years lobbying the PUC.

Essentially, AB 1139 disincentives homeowners who might otherwise want to install solar panels, the cost of which has dropped by about 70 percent over the last 10 years.

The unanswered question here is why Gonzalez would sponsor this bill, which has already passed one Assembly committee and is now headed to another which Gonzalez chairs, where passage is allegedly greased.

Questions repeatedly submitted to her office have gone unanswered.

The reality is that this bill helps no one but profit-driven privately-owned monopoly utilities, like the multiply-convicted Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric.

For the state’s overall commitment to reach 100 percent reliance on renewable energy by midcentury would not change. If home-produced power levels off or is reduced, pressure will increase pressure to expand or build more huge solar-thermal electricity farms in the state’s vast desert areas, says Jennifer Tanner of a group called the Indivisible California Green Team.

The utilities won’t build most of these plants, but they would construct added transmission lines to bring the new power from the desert to their grids.

Building more hundreds of miles of transmission facilities atop what already exists would cost many billions of dollars. Do it and utilities would reap billions in added income over at least 20 years because they are guaranteed a fixed rate of return – often about 14 percent per year– on investments in new facilities.

This inevitably leads to higher rates for consumers, who will also provide – through their monthly bills – money to repay with interest any loans the utilities take for adding transmission capacity.

One reason some advocates of the massive solar thermal facilities give for de-emphasizing rooftop solar, as AB 1139 definitely would – is the claim that only the wealthy can afford it. But today’s lower prices for solar panels mean see 43 percent of new installations done by lower- and middle-income homeowners.

All of which makes this one of the most anti-consumer, anti-homeowner and anti-green proposals ever seen in Sacramento.

Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, “The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It,” is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net

Related Posts

Texas Man Sentenced to 33 Months for Threatening U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters

June 18, 2024

June 18, 2024

Gaherty Targeted the Congresswoman With Racist and Violent Threats  A Texas man was sentenced to 33 months in federal prison...

Brand New, Six-Bed Palisades Mansion Hits Market at $34M

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

The lower level boasts a bar, lounge, wine tasting room, home theater, and a full spa with a gym A...

Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger Cut Price on Palisades Home by $6.5M

June 12, 2024

June 12, 2024

The couple purchased the property in June 2018 for $15.6 million and extensively remodeled it While actor Chris Pratt’s box-office...

Lawsuit Filed Over Pacific Palisades Property Foreclosure: Report

June 11, 2024

June 11, 2024

The Dispute Over the Site Dates Back to 2014 The owners of a Pacific Palisades residential site are fighting to...

Ivy-Covered Mansion on Amalfi Dr. With Eight Bedrooms Hits Market at $38M

June 4, 2024

June 4, 2024

Situated on One of the Largest Lots in Riviera, the Property Includes a Two-Story Guest House A luxurious estate designed...

TripAdvisor Ranked This Santa Monica Hotel #1 in America

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

The Ranking Honored the Highest Level of Excellence in Travel, Recognizing Those Who Receive a High Volume of Exceptional Review...

Los Angeles County Rent Relief Program Opens Second Round of Applications

May 21, 2024

May 21, 2024

Applications Accepted Until June 4, Funding and Support Have Been Increased  The Los Angeles County Rent Relief Program (LARRP) has...

Three-Story Complex Opens in Santa Monica, Offers Tenants “Creative” Office Space

May 15, 2024

May 15, 2024

The Building Is Divided Into Two Wings, Connected by a Glass-Enclosed Walk-Through Bridge Structure C.W. Driver Companies, has officially completed...

Glass “Butterfly” Mansion in Malibu Goes for $200K Monthly

May 15, 2024

May 15, 2024

Designed by Renowned Architect Ed Niles Faia and Completed in 2022 After Nearly Two Decades of Construction, the Centerpiece of...

Mini Compound on Brooks Ave Lists for $2.5M

May 13, 2024

May 13, 2024

The primary bedroom, complete with an ensuite, beckons through French doors to a rear garden This tranquil $2.49 million mini...

Classic Tudor Estate Near Palisades Village Listed for Nearly $7M

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

A detached studio sits adjacent to a sparkling pool, while a detached two-car garage is adorned with lush ivy A...

Five-Unit Multi-Family Property Along Venice Canals Hits Market at $7M

May 6, 2024

May 6, 2024

Joint Effort to Share Revenue Marks Milestone in Malibu School District Autonomy An opportunity for both owner/users and investors, this...

Report: Real Estate CEO Loses Palisades Home to Foreclosure

May 1, 2024

May 1, 2024

The News Comes a Little Over Two Months After TRD Reported That Kenig Is Suing Rabbi Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto By...

New Via De La Paz Property Hits Market at $8.9M

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

Descend to the Basement to Uncover a State-of-the-Art Theater, Expansive Entertainment Area, Private Guest Suite Located at 600 Vía De...

Report: Video Game Mogul Lists Palisades Home for $9.2M

April 18, 2024

April 18, 2024

Built in 2018, the Wood-Shingled Home Spans 7,000 Square Feet across Multiple Levels Dan Houser, the English video game magnate,...